Validity and Reliability of the Catastrophic Cognitions Questionnaire-Turkish Version

dc.contributor.authorTurkcapar, Mehmet Hakan
dc.contributor.authorKart, Aysegul
dc.contributor.authorOnder, Ozgur Ozgur
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-20T11:30:38Z
dc.date.available2019-11-20T11:30:38Z
dc.date.issued2015-04
dc.departmentHKÜ, İktisadi, İdari ve Sosyal Bilimler Fakültesi, Psikoloji Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractAim: Importance of catastrophic cognitions is well known for the development and maintance of panic disorder. Catastrophic Cognitions Questionnaire (CCQ) measures thoughts associated with danger and was originally developed by Khawaja (1 992). In this study, it is aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of CCQ-Turkish version. Material and Method: CCQ was administered to 250 patients with panic disorder. Turkish version of CCQ was created by translation, back-translation and pilot assessment. Fools demographic Data Form and CCQ Turkish version were administered to parcipants. Reliability of CCQ was analyzed by test-retest correlation, split-half technique. Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Construct validity was evaluated by factor analysis after the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KM 0) and Bartlett test had been performed. Principal component analysis and varimax rotation were used for factor analysis. Results: Fifty-five point six percent (n=139) of the participants were female and fourty-four point four percent (n=111) were male. Internal consistency of the questionnaire was calculated 0.920 by Cronbach alpha. In analysis performed by split-half method reliability coefficients of half questionnaire were found as 0.917 and 0.832. Again spearmenbrown coefficient was found as 0.875 by the same analysis. Factor analysis revealed five basic factors. These five factors explained,566.2 of the total variance. Discussion: The results of this study show that the Turkish version of CCQ is a reliable and valid scale.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAyse Kart. (January 01, 2016). Validity and Reliability of the Catastrophic Cognitions Questionnaire-Turkish Version. Journal of Clinical and Analytical Medicine, 6, 150, 121-124.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4328/JCAM.2704
dc.identifier.endpage124en_US
dc.identifier.issn1309-0720
dc.identifier.issn1309-2014
dc.identifier.issue150en_US
dc.identifier.startpage121en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4328/JCAM.2704
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11782/832
dc.identifier.volume6en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000215587000007
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.language.isotr
dc.publisherDERMAN MEDICAL PUBLen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND ANALYTICAL MEDICINE
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCatastrophic Cognitions Questionnaireen_US
dc.subjectValidityen_US
dc.subjectReliabilityen_US
dc.titleValidity and Reliability of the Catastrophic Cognitions Questionnaire-Turkish Version
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
000215587000007.pdf
Boyut:
643 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Makale Dosyası

Lisans paketi

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.56 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: