Is YouTube a reliable source for athletic taping?

dc.contributor.authorUsgu, Serkan
dc.contributor.authorKudas, Savas
dc.contributor.authorTaka, Ozgur
dc.contributor.authorYakut, Yavuz
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-21T08:21:26Z
dc.date.available2022-07-21T08:21:26Z
dc.date.issuedMAR 2022en_US
dc.departmentHKÜ, Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground Taping has a critical role in athlete health. Aims To evaluate the quality, characteristics and reliability of the most viewed taping videos in YouTube. Methods Uploaded videos were searched with "athletic taping" and "rigid taping" keywords in YouTube. The educational content quality of the videos was assessed using the Global Quality Scale (GQS), and reliability was evaluated using the Journal American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria. Video uploaders (source) were divided into three groups (physiotherapists (PT), athletic trainers (AT) and non-PT/AT) and compared in terms of video quality, reliability and characteristics. Results 82 videos were included in the study. The mean JAMA score of the videos was 2.91 +/- 0.89 and GQS score was 4.06 +/- 0.87. A significant difference was found among video uploading groups base on days since upload, number of views, daily views, dislikes, like ratio, and JAMA and GQS scores (p < 0.05). Less number of days since upload was found for AT videos versus PT and non-PT/AT videos (p = 0.007, p = 0.007). The number of views and daily views were higher for PT videos than AT videos (p = 0.004, p = 0.017). The number of dislikes was also higher for PT videos compared to AT videos (p = 0.017), with no significant difference versus non-PT/AT group (p < 0.05). Non-PT/AT videos showed a greater like ratio than PT videos (p = 0.022). PT videos had higher JAMA and GQS scores compared to AT and non-PT/AT videos (p = 0.001 vs. p = 0.001, p = 0.010 vs. p = 0.001). Conclusion YouTube can be regarded as a useful platform that provides high quality and reliable videos on athletic taping.en_US
dc.identifier.citationUsgu, S., Kudas, S., Taka, O., & Yakut, Y. (March 01, 2022). Is YouTube a reliable source for athletic taping?. Sport Sciences for Health, 18, 1, 227-233.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11332-021-00798-9
dc.identifier.endpage233en_US
dc.identifier.issn1824-7490
dc.identifier.issn1825-1234
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-4820-9490en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85108946415
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage227en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-021-00798-9
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11782/2602
dc.identifier.volume18en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000771137600026
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSPRINGERNATUREen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSPORT SCIENCES FOR HEALTH
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjecte-healthen_US
dc.subjectSourceen_US
dc.subjectYouTubeen_US
dc.subjectAthletesen_US
dc.subjectTapingen_US
dc.titleIs YouTube a reliable source for athletic taping?
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
WOS000771137600026.pdf
Boyut:
741.85 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Makale Dosyası

Lisans paketi

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: