ChatGPT as a collaborative research assistant in the ICF linking process of the brief version of the Burn Specific Health Scale

dc.contributor.authorBayramlar, Kezban
dc.contributor.authorGül, Hatice
dc.contributor.authorÇınar, Murat Ali
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-08T06:47:40Z
dc.date.available2025-09-08T06:47:40Z
dc.date.issued2025en_US
dc.departmentHKÜ, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Anabilim Dalıen_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Burn injuries profoundly affect multiple aspects of health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The Brief Version of the Burn Specific Health Scale (BSHS-B) is commonly used to assess HRQoL in burn survivors. Linking such tools to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) enhances data comparability and standardisation for patients with burn injuries. However, linking process is often complex and time- consuming. Large language models may support linking process and help streamline future linking studies in burn rehabilitation. Objectives: This study evaluated the feasibility of using ChatGPT-4o as a collaborative assistant in the ICF linking process of BSHS-B items. Methods: The study followed the refined ICF linking rules. In the first stage, two physiotherapists independently linked the contents of BSHS-B items to ICF categories. When the two linkers disagreed, a third assigned the item to a category. In the second stage, ChatGPT-4o guided by specialised prompting performed the same task according to linking rules. In the content analysis, Cohen’s Kappa coefficient was computed to evaluate the consistency between expert consensus and ChatGPT-4o-based linking. An agreement on item perspective analyses was also conducted. Frequencies of identified ICF categories across major domains were reported descriptively. Results: The agreement between linkers on ICF category assignment was fair (κ = 0.41, p < .001), while ChatGPT and expert consensus agreement was moderate (κ = 0.55, p < .001). In the perspective analysis, agreement between experts was fair (κ = 0.21, p < .01), whereas ChatGPT demonstrated almost perfect agreement with experts (κ = 0.86, p < .001). A total of 25 ICF codes were identified, mainly in Activity Participation (52.11 %) and Body Functions (40.85 %). Conclusion: ChatGPT demonstrated substantial potential in the ICF linking process as a supportive tool. While not replacing human expertise, ChatGPT may be able to reduce workload and facilitate ICF linking process.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBayramlar, Kezban, Gül, Hatice & Çınar, Murat Ali (2025). ChatGPT as a collaborative research assistant in the ICF linking process of the brief version of the Burn Specific Health Scale. (51,7).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2025.107609.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.burns.2025.107609
dc.identifier.issn03054179
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6760-2175en_US
dc.identifier.pmid40651118
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105010217779
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2025.107609
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11782/4918
dc.identifier.volume51en_US
dc.identifier.wosN/A
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectChatGPT-4oen_US
dc.subjectICF linkingen_US
dc.subjectOutcome measurementen_US
dc.titleChatGPT as a collaborative research assistant in the ICF linking process of the brief version of the Burn Specific Health Scale
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
1-s2.0-S0305417925002384-main.pdf
Boyut:
435.56 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:

Lisans paketi

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: