The effects of different wing configurations on missile aerodynamics

dc.contributor.authorSumnu, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorGuzelbey, Ibrahim Halil
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-13T09:17:38Z
dc.date.available2023-11-13T09:17:38Z
dc.date.issuedSEP 2023en_US
dc.departmentHKÜ, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Makine Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractIn the present study, missile aerodynamic analysis is performed using different wing configurations at subsonic and transonic speeds. The wing is critical component in point of aerodynamic efficiency for a missile that speed is especially closer to transonic level because of flow separation. Flow on the wings may adversely effect tailfins of missile at high speed since it may cause vortex generation and flow disturbances. There are few studies that investigate the missile wing using different configurations at critical speeds when examined the previous studies. Therefore, in this study, three different wing configurations are investigated and aerodynamic performance is compared with each other at 0.7 and 0.9 Mach numbers and 5(degrees) angle of attack (AoA). In beginning of this study, missile model with only tailfins is selected from previous study that contains experimental data. Because the experimental data for the selected missile model are available at supersonic speeds, the aerodynamic analysis to verify the solutions is carried out at supersonic speeds. After wing is mounted to the selected missile, aerodynamic analysis is carried out using three different wing configurations that are Tapered Leading Edge, Tapered Trailing Edge, and Double Tapered wings. Lift to drag ratio (C-L/C-D) is calculated to compare wing configurations and it is concluded that Tapered Leading Edge wing configuration shows higher performance then other wing configurations. C-L/C-D values are 2.327, 2.306, 2.303 at 0.7 Mach number and 2.45, 2.429, 2.423 at 0.9 Mach number for Tapered Leading Edge, Tapered Trailing Edge, and Double Tapered, respectively. When the results are compared each other, C-L/C-D values at 0.9 Mach number is higher about % 5.28, %5.33 and %5.21 than the C-L/C-D values at 0.7 Mach number for missile with Tapered Leading Edge, Tapered Trailing Edge, and Double Tapered, respectively.en_US
dc.identifier.citationSumnu, A. & Güzelbey, IH. (SEP 2023). The effects of different wing configurations on missile aerodynamics. Journal Of Thermal Engıneerıng. ( 9, 5, 1260-1271.). https://doi.org/10.18186/thermal.00000.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.18186/thermal.00000
dc.identifier.endpage1271en_US
dc.identifier.issn2148-7847
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-2522-3705en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85174504514
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage1260en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.18186/thermal.00000
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11782/4041
dc.identifier.volume9en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001086168400001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherYıldız Technıcal Unıven_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Thermal Engıneerıng
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.snmzHKUDK
dc.subjectMissile Aerodynamicsen_US
dc.subjectTurbulence Modelen_US
dc.subjectMissile Wing Configurationen_US
dc.subjectCFDen_US
dc.titleThe effects of different wing configurations on missile aerodynamics
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
001086168400001.pdf
Boyut:
3.64 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Makale Dosyası

Lisans paketi

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: